Master’s student earns top marks for dissent
University of Toronto rabble-rouser graduates in a gown of protest - but still faces criminal charges from a sit-in gone wrong
KATE HAMMER, The Globe and Mail
Compiled by Editorial Research
June 21, 2008
Her pale face bobbing in a black sea of robes, Oriel Varga nearly disappeared in the graduate procession. But as she moved toward the stage at the University of Toronto’s Convocation Hall this month, campus police had her in their sights.
A navy blue cape embroidered with white felt letters hung across her narrow shoulders: “I spent a night in jail for U of T’s crackdown on student dissent,” it read.
When she approached the stage to receive her master’s degree in education, a campus police officer blocked her way and asked her to leave. Ms. Varga refused, and a standoff began; the diminutive student activist in her navy cape versus the stalwart officer in his navy uniform.
But the student activist had not only brought her parents to her convocation, she also brought her lawyer, human-rights activist Selwyn Pieters, who intervened. Ms. Varga proceeded to the stage and received her degree.
It was an appropriate closing scene to her long and eventful career at the University of Toronto. She is among the 14 students, dubbed the U of T Fightfees 14, facing criminal charges after a March 20 sit-in at the university’s administrative buildings turned violent. But whether the students or the campus police perpetrated that violence remains a matter of debate, and although the students face criminal charges, the young university presidency of David Naylor is also on trial in the courts of student opinion.
A lot is at stake: Ms. Varga and her fellow students face charges of mischief, forcible confinement and forcible detainer that could land them in jail. Mr. Naylor, appointed three years ago to head one of the largest and most prestigious universities in North America, is accused by students of being an enemy of free speech.
“While dissent is inevitable and indeed part of the fabric of every university, this type of out-of-control protest that disrupts the work of the institution and sees staff barricaded in an office simply can’t be allowed to occur,” Mr. Naylor said in a telephone interview.
Standing outside Convocation Hall after the ceremony, a flash rainstorm made Ms. Varga’s hair hug her face like brown parentheses. She moved through the rain-soaked crowd timidly, side-stepping stragglers rather than pushing through them, weaving toward her parents, a diminutive pair of Hungarian immigrants who beamed with pride.
As students stopped to read her cape and congratulate her, Ms. Varga nodded and smiled, then continued toward mom and dad.
She has already spent a night in jail for rejecting the initial conditions of her bail, which barred her from campus and from communicating with her co-defendants, and she hopes not to spend another there.
“None of us expected anything like this,” she said.
Her delicate build and shy disposition make her well cast in the role of David, and she has battled an army of Goliaths. Throughout her undergraduate years, Ms. Varga regularly slept in a park to protest against homelessness. An enormous tableau she painted as a criticism of the university’s leadership hangs, after some controversy, on the top floor of the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Her next standoff will be over the events of a grey Thursday before the Easter long weekend.
Student groups had organized a protest against residential-fee increases at the university’s New College and had occupied the university’s offices within the ivy-covered walls of Simcoe Hall.
According to university staff and other witnesses, protesters waved flags and signs advertising diverse causes, from the New College residence-fee rise, to the abolition of tuition fees, to Israeli apartheid, and demanded a meeting with Mr. Naylor, who wasn’t in his office that day.
By 5 p.m., campus police, concerned about safety as they moved through the protester-packed hallways, had asked most of the administrative staff to leave. Only six remained. Police attempts to clear the hallways as those staff prepared to leave caused the protest to escalate.
The next four minutes of this escalation are captured in a grainy video posted on YouTube. As protesters erupt into choruses of “shame!” the camera pans right and officers and students come into view, grabbing at one another in a way that could be described as neither friendly nor violent. A young man, seated on the floor, blocks a doorway and is lifted and tossed by a bald man who appears to be a campus police officer. The image bumps and shifts, and another young man in a torn white tank top emerges from beneath the feet of the crowd.
Unfortunately, rather than revealing what transpired, the video only indicates a tempest of activity just outside the camera’s frame. Students say they were pushed, dragged and trampled by police; university employees say that they were tripped by hysterical students who writhed on the floor and grabbed at their legs.
All agree that what unfolded was deplorably violent.
Mr. Pieters, Ms. Varga’s lawyer, advised her not to discuss the sit-in, but she characterized it as a peaceful attempt to gain Mr. Naylor’s ear.
“I’m very concerned with president Naylor’s direction and the student community understands that this is a crackdown on student rights,” she said.
However, observers not employed by the university have called the student-protesters’ behaviour “hysterical” and “belligerent,” and days after the sit-in, the New College Student Council rescinded its support of Always Question, one of the main groups that organized the protest.
Mr. Naylor said that he was saddened the criminal charges may lead to “potentially difficult outcomes” for the students, but that a strong reaction by the university was necessary.
“The bottom line is, this isn’t about free speech and dissent, it’s about what was a relatively disorganized protest that simply spiralled a little bit out of control and led to some bad decisions about how to advance a cause,” he said.
The university’s governing council approved the New College residence-fee increases a few days after the sit-in.
Ms. Varga and the rest of the U of T Fightfees 14 are scheduled to appear in court July 3.
June 28th, 2008 at 4:26 pm
I watched this protest. The police were extremely professional, whereas the protesters were angry and disruptive. Since the incident, AlwaysQuestion has taken extreme measures to silence the voices of any students who disagree with them.
Ms. Varga and her friends had no right to force their way into Simcoe Hall and occupy it. And for what it’s worth, few things scare me more than the idea that a small, vocal and radical group like this can demand immediate access to the administration any time they have demands they want met. That scares me a lot, because as a majority of students on facebook, youtube, and the varsity website have shown, you do not speak for them.
June 29th, 2008 at 1:50 pm
Unless you were in Simcoe Hall, there’s no way you “watched” the protest. You claim AQ has taken extreme measures to “silence” disagreement but their web site (AlwaysQuestion.info) has vigorous debate — and this one has published your comments.
The rest of your comment is basically paraphrasing Naylor’s statement. Good on you for independent thought.
June 29th, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Actually, I never heard his statement. However, if as you say my independent thought agrees with his, that isn’t a crime, that is an agreement.
And yes, they do tend to silence their critics. They disabled comments on their youtube video because students were overwhelmingly condemning their actions.
I’m not criticizing this website and never have. I agree that student fees deserve careful scrutiny and discussion. Forcing your way into Simcoe Hall is not a debate, it is an act of violence and control, and I hope the people involved are held accountable for their actions.
June 29th, 2008 at 10:22 pm
I’ll reiterate that I’m not sure how you “watched” the protest. Unless you saw the YouTube video, which was a very small slice of what happened.
AQ disabled comments on YouTube because it was increasingly acrimonious, and in particular sexist and racist comments were being made. People were directed to make comments on the AlwaysQuestion.info web site. And you still can.
What’s debatable is if the demonstrators “forced” their way into Simcoe Hall to begin with.
July 19th, 2008 at 4:37 am
the battle between small communities
and corporation ideas will never is like
a never -eanding -struggle!